范文阅读导入练习 →

加纳家庭的冰箱电力和用水情况Access to refrigerator, electricity and water in Ghana

Task 1 · Academic数据时序变化概括家庭与社会208 词AI 估评 7.5 分
AI 估评 7.5 分查看四维评分详情

四个维度等权计分,均值 7.5,按半分档展示。AI 估评供学习参考。

任务完成度 TA7 / 9

组间差异和低收入组部分下降概述正确,多数数字准确;非贫困组冰箱、水只有定性描述,且把非贫困直接叫富裕或富人,超过资料分类。

档位依据:清楚概述与主要趋势满足7档;分类偏移及较少支撑使其未达8档。

查看评分证据
  • non-poor or affluent households made clear gains

    非贫困不必然等于富裕。

  • Refrigerator ownership among this wealthier group likewise improved over time

    正确方向但遗漏24至37%的显著变化。

  • 题图证据

    已查看柱图,极贫/贫困/非贫困依次:冰箱3/11/24至3/7/37;电力48/57/73至34/48/85;水55/69/76至57/69/80,单位%。图注水为私人管道、邻居私人来源或公共管道。

改进建议

  • 保留non-poor原分类,并补其冰箱24至37%、水76至80%的数据。

连贯与衔接 CC8 / 9

按贫困组分段,每段对照前后,末段回到组间差距;组织清楚、指代大体稳定。

档位依据:分组和衔接管理符合8档;末尾重复差距概述,尚非9档的精练管理。

查看评分证据
  • Among the “poor” category (just above the very poor)

    明确转组并解释分类。

  • As the rich gained more in terms of basic utilities, the poorest either stagnated or lost ground in certain areas.

    结尾重申前文差距,略重复。

改进建议

  • 用一项最大差距变化收束,代替重复概述。

词汇资源 LR7 / 9

amenities、deteriorated、stagnated等范围充分;affluent/rich不忠于分类,more promising偏评价。

档位依据:有灵活表达支持7档;语义和客观性不够稳定,未达8档。

查看评分证据
  • Water access for this group was more promising

    promising加入预测性评价。

  • the poorest either stagnated or lost ground

    简洁表达变化,但可更直接写设施可及比例。

改进建议

  • 用increased slightly等客观描述,避免把收入分类扩展为富人。

语法范围与准确性 GRA8 / 9

关系从句、对照和让步结构准确,句子形式丰富,标点良好。

档位依据:范围和多数无误句达到8档;部分句反复主句加while,未充分体现9档灵活性。

查看评分证据
  • even though nearly 48% of them were connected to electricity

    让步和被动结构正确。

  • while their water access also increased slightly

    对比从句准确。

改进建议

  • 在保持准确性基础上,把同组设施变化合为有明确比较关系的句子。

评分日期:2026-10-23 · 评分规则:IELTS 写作公开评分标准(2023 年 5 月版)

作文题目

来源页题目,与同页选定答案配套;未核为实际考试真题

The graph below shows the percentage of households, grouped by poverty, on the basis of access to refrigerator, electricity and water in Ghana for the year 1991/1992 to 1998/1999. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should write at least 150 words.
题目配图:IELTS Graph # 302 – Access to refrigerator, electricity and water in Ghana
来源题图 · 查看来源
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of Ghanaian households, classified by poverty status, that had access to electricity, refrigerators, and water in 1991/1992 compared with 1998/1999. Overall, non-poor households enjoyed far greater access to all three basic amenities than very poor or poor families, while in some cases, access for the lower-income groups actually declined over the period. In the early 1990s, only about 3% of the very poor had refrigerators, even though nearly 48% of them were connected to electricity. Interestingly, by 1998/99, that figure fell sharply to around 34%. Water access for this group was more promising as it increased modestly from roughly 55% to 57%. Among the “poor” category (just above the very poor), refrigerator access dropped from 11% to 7% over time. Their electricity connection also deteriorated slightly, but water access remained stable at roughly 69% throughout the period. In contrast, non-poor or affluent households made clear gains. Access to electricity rose from around 73% to 85% in seven years, while their water access also increased slightly. Refrigerator ownership among this wealthier group likewise improved over time, reflecting a widening inequality. As the rich gained more in terms of basic utilities, the poorest either stagnated or lost ground in certain areas.
文章身份
机构教研范文
题目来源
教学题目
句子漫游 · 我的账户

欢迎回来

注册后可主动领取 3–7 天新手券。

选择适合你的练习节奏

练习时长

AI 学习需有可用练习时长。