范文阅读导入练习 →

克隆人类的利弊与伦理Human Cloning: Benefits, Risks and Ethics

Task 2 · 来源范文同意或不同意科技与科学277 词AI 估评 7.5 分
AI 估评 7.5 分查看四维评分详情

四个维度等权计分,均值 7.5,按半分档展示。AI 估评供学习参考。

任务回应 TR7 / 9

同意程度与伦理保留清楚,供体和生命权论点相关;所有器官获取都涉及杀死克隆人的假设未限定,克隆已故亲属的问题仅反问,结论肯定动物克隆未论证。

档位依据:7档有发展支持;8档需伦理条件更精确、支撑更充分。

查看评分证据
  • then eventually killing them in order to use their organs

    核心反对基于未说明范围的假设。

  • cloning relatives or family members who have died

    提出边界问题但未解释危害。

改进建议

  • 明确讨论有独立人格的克隆人,并说明其同意权与生命权为何限制取器官。

连贯与衔接 CC8 / 9

供体收益、伦理问题和结论顺序清楚,Firstly、Also与Furthermore有作用;伦理段集中过多理由,末尾动物话题突然。

档位依据:8档总体易读;9档需主题和收束更集中。

查看评分证据
  • However, for good reasons

    明确转向反对理由。

  • Cloning animals has been a positive development

    结尾引入未展开评价。

改进建议

  • 结论只总结对人类克隆的立场和保留。

词汇资源 LR7 / 9

ethical issues、organ donors、dilemmas和breakthroughs准确,资源足够;spare body parts和around语体较口语,关键伦理术语变化有限。

档位依据:7档有一定灵活精确性;8档需语体和概念更精细。

查看评分证据
  • a ready supply

    供给搭配自然。

  • not enough organ donors around

    around略口语随意。

改进建议

  • 用organ availability、consent和rights明确论点,避免泛称spare parts。

语法范围与准确性 GRA8 / 9

虚拟条件、被动、关系和间接问句多数准确,长句有变化;which it could be argued is murder插入结构标点可更清晰。

档位依据:8档准确复杂结构成立;9档需插入语控制更稳。

查看评分证据
  • If humans were cloned, their organs could then be used

    虚拟条件与被动准确。

  • which it could be argued is murder

    插入成分可用逗号隔开或简化。

改进建议

  • 改为which could be considered murder或分隔插入语。

评分日期:2026-10-23 · 评分规则:IELTS 写作公开评分标准(2023 年 5 月版)

作文题目

来源题目;实际考试出处未核实

As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction. To what extent do you agree with such a procedure? Have you any reservations?
The cloning of animals has been occurring for a number of years now, and this has now opened up the possibility of cloning humans too. Although there are clear benefits to humankind of cloning to provide spare body parts, I believe it raises a number of worrying ethical issues. Due to breakthroughs in medical science and improved diets, people are living much longer than in the past. This, though, has brought with it problems. As people age, their organs can fail so they need replacing. If humans were cloned, their organs could then be used to replace those of sick people. It is currently the case that there are often not enough organ donors around to fulfil this need, so cloning humans would overcome the issue as there would then be a ready supply. However, for good reasons, many people view this as a worrying development. Firstly, there are religious arguments against it. It would involve creating other human beings and then eventually killing them in order to use their organs, which it could be argued is murder. This is obviously a sin according to religious texts. Also, dilemmas would arise over what rights these people have, as surely they would be humans just like the rest of us. Furthermore, if we have the ability to clone humans, it has to be questioned where this cloning will end. Is it then acceptable for people to start cloning relatives or family members who have died? To conclude, I do not agree with this procedure due to the ethical issues and dilemmas it would create. Cloning animals has been a positive development, but this is where it should end.
文章身份
机构教研范文
题目来源
教学题目
句子漫游 · 我的账户

欢迎回来

注册后可主动领取 3–7 天新手券。

选择适合你的练习节奏

练习时长

AI 学习需有可用练习时长。