超市销售世界各地的食品Food from Around the World in Supermarkets
AI 估评 8 分查看四维评分详情
四个维度等权计分,均值 8,按半分档展示。AI 估评供学习参考。
任务回应 TR7 / 9
立场一致,两项理由有相关例子。进口必然更便宜、竞争不公平以及农业多样性下降的联系概括偏宽,结论据此全面否定略强。
档位依据:主要观点扩展达到7分;过度概括和部分因果缺口限制8分。
查看评分证据
they create unfair competition for local farmers who struggle to compete with cheaper, mass-produced imports.
假定进口都更便宜且竞争不公平,条件尚未限定。
This results in reduced income for domestic farmers and a loss of agricultural diversity.
收入影响可以跟随,但多样性减少还缺退出种植等中间机制。
改进建议
- 限定价格竞争的产品与情境,并解释本地品种因收益降低而退出种植的过程。
连贯与衔接 CC8 / 9
引言、农业和环境两个主体及结论对应清楚,例证位置合适。环境段几次重述排放与污染,略有重复但阅读顺畅。
档位依据:良好逻辑顺序与分段达到8分;少量重复未达9分。
查看评分证据
Secondly, the environmental impact of transporting food across long distances is significant.
清楚进入第二理由。
This reliance on global supply chains increases pollution and has long-term consequences for the planet.
再次总结本段环境危害,内容略重复。
改进建议
- 用最后一句补充具体影响或限定条件,避免第三次重复污染结论。
词汇资源 LR8 / 9
influx、globally sourced、carbon footprint及supply chains等范围广且大多准确,农业与环境语境匹配。significant、substantial等强化词稍密集。
档位依据:广泛流畅资源达到8分;个别精确性和简洁度不足以达9分。
查看评分证据
the influx of globally sourced food items threatens local agriculture.
词汇具体表达进口商品流入。
The carbon footprint associated with importing food is substantial
术语贴题,但substantial没有进一步区分运输方式。
改进建议
- 使用运输距离或方式等具体限定替代一处泛化的程度形容词。
语法范围与准确性 GRA9 / 9
关系、时间、让步与原因结构灵活准确,非谓语与并列搭配清楚。主谓、时态和标点稳定。
档位依据:范围广且全篇准确,符合9分。
查看评分证据
When supermarkets stock products from distant countries, they create unfair competition for local farmers who struggle to compete
时间与关系从句层次准确。
fruits and vegetables from countries with warmer climates are frequently flown to colder regions, consuming considerable energy and resources.
被动与结果分词结构准确。
改进建议
- 保持现有复杂句控制,增加限定条件时保持主干清楚。
评分日期:2026-10-23 · 评分规则:IELTS 写作公开评分标准(2023 年 5 月版)
作文题目
来源题目;实际考试出处未核实
In many countries nowadays, consumers can go to a supermarket and buy food produced all over the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
The widespread availability of international food in supermarkets has sparked considerable debate in recent times. While it may seem like a positive development, I believe this trend is detrimental for several reasons. The reliance on imported goods undermines local agriculture and promotes environmental harm, making it a negative development.
Firstly, the influx of globally sourced food items threatens local agriculture. When supermarkets stock products from distant countries, they create unfair competition for local farmers who struggle to compete with cheaper, mass-produced imports. For instance, local fruit and vegetable growers may find it difficult to sell their produce when foreign alternatives flood the market at lower prices. This results in reduced income for domestic farmers and a loss of agricultural diversity. Moreover, the growth of supermarket chains that rely heavily on imports often leads to the decline of smaller, local food markets, which are vital for preserving traditional farming methods.
Secondly, the environmental impact of transporting food across long distances is significant. The carbon footprint associated with importing food is substantial, as products often travel by plane or ship, emitting large amounts of greenhouse gases. This widespread distribution of food from different parts of the world contributes to global warming and environmental degradation. For example, fruits and vegetables from countries with warmer climates are frequently flown to colder regions, consuming considerable energy and resources. This reliance on global supply chains increases pollution and has long-term consequences for the planet.
In conclusion, while the availability of international food might offer convenience, it is a negative development due to its harmful effects on local agriculture and the environment.
- 文章身份
- 机构教研范文
- 题目来源
- 教学题目